| >NEW: Info to the keyword duty | >discuss | >create link |
on Jan 15th 2002, 17:47:41, whatevernext96 wrote the following aboutduty |
|
A word to have trouble with, especially since dear Kant insisted on extending it into the even more fearful sounding sphere of the categorical imperative...So, here I am, having introduced a new keyword through a sense of duty – and now worrying whether my motivation for doing so was the morally correct one. Why can't we just have a bit more love, eh, Immanuel?! Uncomplicated, unconditional love..... |
| user rating: +5 |
|
Do not try to answer or comment the text you see above. Nobody will see the things you refer to. Instead, write an atomic text about »duty«! |
| Configuration | Web-Blaster | Statistics | »duty« | FAQ | Home Page |  |
| 0.0038 (0.0010, 0.0009) sek. –– 130567370 | |