agnes wrote on Apr 30th 2004, 14:56:54 about
| Amount of texts to »1st« | 26, and there are 25 texts (96.15%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3) |
| Average lenght of texts | 74 Characters |
| Average Rating | 0.462 points, 4 Not rated texts |
| First text | on Mar 28th 2000, 04:54:00 wrote Alvar about 1st |
| Latest text | on Aug 11th 2007, 21:51:27 wrote alrom about 1st |
| Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 4) |
on Oct 15th 2001, 16:11:41 wrote
on May 26th 2000, 13:34:05 wrote
on Apr 11th 2000, 22:29:59 wrote |
Random associativity, rated above-average positively
Texts to »1st«
ozgrrl wrote on Apr 11th 2000, 21:28:19 about
1st
Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
1st is highly overrated. I can't understand why people are so hung up on firsts – is it pioneering spirit, simple greed or aggressive competitiveness that prompts this need to be 1st at stuff?
Firsts are good for something, I suppose. Without firsts, there would be no seconds or subsequents, would there?
Ron Kling wrote on Apr 8th 2000, 04:06:35 about
1st
Rating: 2 point(s) | Read and rate text individually1st is often the result of quick reflexes. Also, 1st is often the result of the other guy's failures. Do not get too proud of your first.
lopez wrote on Dec 25th 2000, 10:17:45 about
1st
Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually| Some random keywords |
climbing
big
destination
mail
poo-poo
|
| Some random keywords in the german Blaster |
Furby
schwarzgewandet
Hommingberger-Leopardenforelle
Kommunikationsjunkie
Taharrush-Gamea
Leckmaster
|