| Amount of texts to »3D« | 41, and there are 40 texts (97.56%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3) |
| Average lenght of texts | 102 Characters |
| Average Rating | 0.122 points, 26 Not rated texts |
| First text | on Apr 6th 2000, 22:54:34 wrote Dragan about 3D |
| Latest text | on Nov 29th 2024, 02:05:22 wrote Emma Example about 3D |
| Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 26) |
on Dec 7th 2001, 16:20:15 wrote
on Nov 29th 2024, 02:05:15 wrote
on Nov 29th 2024, 02:05:19 wrote |
I think it's a disgrace that 3D movies aren't more common. The year 2000 is already here, but people still refuse to wear stereo glasses. They think they look stupid with them. – In fact they do look stupid, but who cares when you can watch superb stuff like »T-Rex 3D« at you IMAX in return?
the opposite of 3D is NegaD. instead of projecting (or seeming to project) an object outward toward the viewer, it creates concavities. just as there were special cardboard-framed glasses for watching the early 3D movies, there are special NegaD clip-on lenses (also available as contact lenses) for the viewing of videos and stillpix made with this new technology.
be careful! some of the concavities are extremely compelling, and can pull the unwary out of his/her seat.
The creation of immersive 3d environments is the projection of subjectivity itself into technology.
Technology itself has formed its own insides.
| Some random keywords |
WestSideStory
peach
hell
microscope
Loganberry
|
| Some random keywords in the german Blaster |
Bordeaux
Latex
Würzfleisch
SusannesLieblingsTexte
OhneBlasterIstDemMcnepZiemlichLangweilig
hellblau
verwiesen
|