Amount of texts to »Polysemy« 9, and there are 9 texts (100.00%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3)
Average lenght of texts 240 Characters
Average Rating 0.556 points, 3 Not rated texts
First text on Mar 11th 2002, 09:59:32 wrote
Jean-Claude Choul about Polysemy
Latest text on Jan 27th 2009, 19:14:33 wrote
el cojones about Polysemy
Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 3)

on Mar 28th 2005, 16:29:38 wrote
angie about Polysemy

on Jan 27th 2009, 19:14:24 wrote
el cojones about Polysemy

on Jan 27th 2009, 19:14:33 wrote
el cojones about Polysemy

Random associativity, rated above-average positively

Texts to »Polysemy«

Jean-Claude Choul wrote on Mar 11th 2002, 10:26:34 about

Polysemy

Rating: 3 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

Some words have more potential than others for polysemy or polysemic development. »Etiolate« as compared to »Uxorious«, for instance. This is due in part to their combinatorial possibility with other words in creative sentences (as opposed to standard or cliché uses). But even »uxorious« is bisemic, although the dictionary fails to mark the difference between »being excessively fond of« and »being excessively submissive to« (a wife). The test, as always in semantics and linguistics, is substitution. None of the four senses or »fond« can be construed as equivalent to »submissive«. Polysemic potential can be assimilated with the contextual capacity of a word, and can be seen as the application of a given context to the word in question, in a relationship similar to that of argument and predicate.

Jean-Claude Choul wrote on Mar 11th 2002, 09:59:32 about

Polysemy

Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

Polysemy is, according to Webster's Collegiate, the multiplicity of meanings. It is the opposite of monosemy. The word was coined by Michel Bréal, founder of historical semantics, preoccupied, as was his contemporary Antoine Darmesteter, with the evolution of meaning in words. American linguists, often working with utterances, generally speak of lexical ambiguity. But polysemy is a reality, as witnessed by subsenses (usually numbered) in a dictionary entry. Cf. cause, rebellion, rebel (n.& adj.). The vast majority of words are polysemous and, generally speaking, only technical or scientific words are monosemic, at least immediately after being coined or derived. The most abstruse the science or field, the longer monosemy will prevail. Some linguists even suggested that polysemy was paradoxically a sign of meaning depletion, due to frequent uses. Polysemy is especially exploited in poetry and puns.

paxer9999 wrote on Oct 7th 2002, 22:16:48 about

Polysemy

Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

The Polysemy nature of words and/or signs is rooted in the ambiguous and perhaps arbitrary inherent meaning of words and/or signs.

Some random keywords

alone
Created on Apr 19th 2000, 05:31:51 by Intemperate, contains 37 texts

James
Created on Jun 7th 2001, 02:35:00 by yahnah, contains 16 texts

society
Created on Jun 18th 2000, 20:25:35 by boi, contains 25 texts

nourishment
Created on Jun 15th 2009, 14:47:37 by pippi longstockings, contains 1 texts

binladen
Created on Nov 14th 2001, 10:12:21 by hoker poker, contains 6 texts

Some random keywords in the german Blaster

Demystifikation
Created on Feb 23rd 2001, 11:41:29 by the weird set theorist, contains 31 texts

Pantenekuckwantantz
Created on Feb 1st 2002, 21:23:54 by sennez, contains 5 texts

SexmitderEx
Created on Jun 20th 2007, 00:32:08 by Armin, contains 11 texts

Desenrascanço
Created on Mar 9th 2023, 10:02:41 by Bwana Honolulu, contains 3 texts

viermal
Created on Nov 7th 2003, 20:03:38 by dasMoek, contains 10 texts


The Assoziations-Blaster is a project by Assoziations-Blaster-Team | Deutsche Statistik | 0.0179 Sec. Ugly smelling email spammers: eat this!