Amount of texts to »female-superiority« 377, and there are 304 texts (80.64%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3)
Average lenght of texts 252 Characters
Average Rating -1.111 points, 2 Not rated texts
First text on Mar 13th 2003, 12:49:59 wrote
venus about female-superiority
Latest text on Mar 3rd 2020, 14:20:47 wrote
Emma Example about female-superiority
Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 2)

on Feb 13th 2020, 10:50:38 wrote
Schmidt about female-superiority

on Mar 3rd 2020, 14:20:47 wrote
Emma Example about female-superiority

Random associativity, rated above-average positively

Texts to »Female-superiority«

Dr. No wrote on Feb 11th 2004, 14:11:21 about

female-superiority

Rating: 3 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

Sometimes I wonder about these activists who are so outspoken in their crusade for female-superiority. Biggotry is what it is, most of us have learned to recognize it and get past it so we can get on with life. Stop over-compensating for your own guilt.

WBmar wrote on Sep 6th 2003, 05:27:17 about

female-superiority

Rating: 2 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

Male bashing has its roots in the feminist movement. Having gained a sort of equality, they now assert their superiority by exploiting male weaknesses and judging their faults.

Emma Example wrote on Feb 11th 2004, 21:34:26 about

female-superiority

Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

22 i.e. the manner like these interactions in the network of digital discourses carries out themselves, its free shape and availability is the crucial point. The distinction between writing and reading, more exactly said between the documents of writing and reading is first of all medial shifted in digital environments: We can write in the network directly on each page, without having to draw still any tools such as shears, pencil, druckerpresse, because evenly exactly this witnesswitness witness as Tools and programs, when Client are executable Plug in, server programs in the same medium configuration, which are responsible already for displaying the page. The break through-conjugated endlessly by the Dekonstruktivismus that all texts from other texts are together-cut that in each book a further is, which wants out the fact that the texts do not arrive with the readers but as active processprocess processes around the blank characters of the texts, books and discourses around again to constitute exactly, is now in the digital discourses into the code written:

everybody wrote on Feb 1st 2004, 22:46:24 about

female-superiority

Rating: 3 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

It's great that more and more people are now comfortable saying this stupid foolishness openly!


Henri wrote on Oct 9th 2003, 23:05:55 about

female-superiority

Rating: 2 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

Men are obviously the superior gender. Men have always been the leaders and shapers of the world, in society, politics, art, religion, etc. Women have always been their compliant helpers and even servants. Women are more passive and less intelligent than men. And that hasn't changed! After decades of women's »lib« women still have to fight for recognition and status – proof that men still rule things, and that women are naturally subservient. They are, have always been, and always will be the weaker sex!

schmidt wrote on May 1st 2008, 00:45:14 about

female-superiority

Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

Nor did I like, neither dislike female superiority, there are superiors in all sexes, races and so on and there is the hope that those superiors act to the best of all those inferiors.
This are very big themes, practically not to resolve in a general matter.

Emma Example wrote on Dec 24th 2004, 14:37:46 about

female-superiority

Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

Yes there are some biological facts that make stupid people seem indeed superior. But humans and human societies are incredibly complex. While it is true that stupid persons think they are better at school, for example, that does not have to say anything. At least, in my opinion, it can't be wholly explained by biolgy. And see, school today still isn't such a great system...success on that field should not be mistaken for superiority.

Some random keywords

Tolkien
Created on Dec 15th 2002, 20:32:14 by Quorpencetta, contains 5 texts

interrelated
Created on Apr 11th 2000, 06:46:49 by JJ, contains 26 texts

her
Created on May 25th 2005, 17:43:20 by quart, contains 8 texts

midnight
Created on Jun 18th 2002, 17:02:42 by elfboi, contains 4 texts

ilbassocaratteristicamente
Created on Jun 4th 2024, 20:47:22 by Emma Example, contains 1 texts

Some random keywords in the german Blaster

Aaltreffen
Created on Mar 22nd 2006, 23:30:58 by Höflich, contains 3 texts

Salpen
Created on Jan 12th 2007, 12:24:19 by platypus, contains 5 texts

Schabe
Created on Nov 27th 2000, 20:40:27 by ye, contains 29 texts

veröffentlicht
Created on Dec 24th 2002, 21:13:50 by flyaway, contains 9 texts

Eindeutig
Created on Oct 3rd 2000, 21:21:38 by Rufus, contains 38 texts


The Assoziations-Blaster is a project by Assoziations-Blaster-Team | Deutsche Statistik | 0.0465 Sec. Ugly smelling email spammers: eat this!